Some shrewder observations on the “geo-annotation what-does-it-all-mean/why-the-f**k-would-anyone-do-it” question, best summed up in the post and comments on the Akav weblog.
I don’t like the phrases “geo-tagging” or “geo-annotation” much. They don’t convey any sense of place-filtered conversations among groups of people, sparked by shared locations.
And this idea of conversations seems to me a much richer understanding, and a much better starting point for devising facilities and interfaces, than “lets-nail-facts-to-maps-using-GPS” geo-tagging.
My mate Dan is slaving away right now, finishing our place-filtered conversation system for bog-standard mobile phones (2G, GSM, WAP), Anywhereblogs. It’ll be free, and hopefully it’ll be usable anywhere in the world when we’ve done a bit more work on it.
We’ll be trying it out at the Ultrasound festival, and I’ll be giving a little talk about it.
For anyone who doesn’t happen to be in the North of England that day, not to worry, this is a quick summery (with illustrations):
“Lost tourist” services (like Crunkie) try to use mobile phones to navigate through the world.
“Conversation” systems take the real world as an interface to navigate round mobile phones.
Frank Breuer
Atelier Bow-Wow